<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for equk&#039;s place on the web</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.equk.co.uk/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.equk.co.uk</link>
	<description>http://www.equk.co.uk</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 20:00:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EQUK Mini Mod v1.0 by Sam</title>
		<link>http://www.equk.co.uk/2010/06/15/equk-mini-mod-v1-0/comment-page-1/#comment-1483</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 20:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.equk.co.uk/?p=680#comment-1483</guid>
		<description>Hi !

It looks like being a nice mod ! I just have a question regarding video : do you, as well, experiment some delay between audio and video when watching a movie, either with youtube app or a movie player ? I saw other people on samdroidmod.net having these issues, but I wonder if this is more kernel-related or not...

Thanks for your answer,
Regards,

Sam</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi !</p>
<p>It looks like being a nice mod ! I just have a question regarding video : do you, as well, experiment some delay between audio and video when watching a movie, either with youtube app or a movie player ? I saw other people on samdroidmod.net having these issues, but I wonder if this is more kernel-related or not&#8230;</p>
<p>Thanks for your answer,<br />
Regards,</p>
<p>Sam</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Few tweaks &amp; new kernel = linpack higher than nexus one by equk</title>
		<link>http://www.equk.co.uk/2010/06/07/few-tweaks-new-kernel-linpack-higher-than-nexus-one/comment-page-1/#comment-1482</link>
		<dc:creator>equk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 10:21:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.equk.co.uk/?p=644#comment-1482</guid>
		<description>With “ROM: I570EXXJE4 (eclair) // kernel: LK2.06.beta4 // equk mini mod // relocate dalvik to /cache)” I am getting around 5MFLOPS &amp; haven&#039;t had any problems with stuff dropping out.
The huge tombstones dump files aren&#039;t there either so guess that was all a side effect of having JIT.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With “ROM: I570EXXJE4 (eclair) // kernel: LK2.06.beta4 // equk mini mod // relocate dalvik to /cache)” I am getting around 5MFLOPS &#038; haven&#8217;t had any problems with stuff dropping out.<br />
The huge tombstones dump files aren&#8217;t there either so guess that was all a side effect of having JIT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Few tweaks &amp; new kernel = linpack higher than nexus one by James</title>
		<link>http://www.equk.co.uk/2010/06/07/few-tweaks-new-kernel-linpack-higher-than-nexus-one/comment-page-1/#comment-1476</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 22:08:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.equk.co.uk/?p=644#comment-1476</guid>
		<description>&gt; I decided it wasn’t worth sacrificing the stability for the extra speed.

From what I understand - if anything - is that it should improve very little beyond your battery life.

Just out of curiosity what was you Linpack score using just the following modifs : &quot;ROM: I570EXXJE4 (eclair) // kernel: LK2.06.beta4 // equk mini mod // relocate dalvik to /cache)&quot;?

TIA
James</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; I decided it wasn’t worth sacrificing the stability for the extra speed.</p>
<p>From what I understand &#8211; if anything &#8211; is that it should improve very little beyond your battery life.</p>
<p>Just out of curiosity what was you Linpack score using just the following modifs : &#8220;ROM: I570EXXJE4 (eclair) // kernel: LK2.06.beta4 // equk mini mod // relocate dalvik to /cache)&#8221;?</p>
<p>TIA<br />
James</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Few tweaks &amp; new kernel = linpack higher than nexus one by equk</title>
		<link>http://www.equk.co.uk/2010/06/07/few-tweaks-new-kernel-linpack-higher-than-nexus-one/comment-page-1/#comment-1475</link>
		<dc:creator>equk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 10:01:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.equk.co.uk/?p=644#comment-1475</guid>
		<description>These results are from using the ARM11 optimized kernel from samdroid and the ARM11 optimized JIT.

equkmod doesn&#039;t include JIT as it seems to be really buggy. I have experienced the google sync services dropping out and lost push email due to this.

Without JIT there don&#039;t seem to be any problems so I decided it wasn&#039;t worth sacrificing the stability for the extra speed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These results are from using the ARM11 optimized kernel from samdroid and the ARM11 optimized JIT.</p>
<p>equkmod doesn&#8217;t include JIT as it seems to be really buggy. I have experienced the google sync services dropping out and lost push email due to this.</p>
<p>Without JIT there don&#8217;t seem to be any problems so I decided it wasn&#8217;t worth sacrificing the stability for the extra speed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EQUK Mini Mod v1.0 by equk</title>
		<link>http://www.equk.co.uk/2010/06/15/equk-mini-mod-v1-0/comment-page-1/#comment-1474</link>
		<dc:creator>equk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 09:54:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.equk.co.uk/?p=680#comment-1474</guid>
		<description>The volume is controlled in the kernel.
To reduce the volume you would need to put on a kernel which doesn&#039;t have the volume tweak or compile your own.

The earlier LKMod kernel had the samsung startup sound commented out in the source so you wouldn&#039;t even hear it, so you could maybe try one of those and still retain the volume tweak</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The volume is controlled in the kernel.<br />
To reduce the volume you would need to put on a kernel which doesn&#8217;t have the volume tweak or compile your own.</p>
<p>The earlier LKMod kernel had the samsung startup sound commented out in the source so you wouldn&#8217;t even hear it, so you could maybe try one of those and still retain the volume tweak</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Few tweaks &amp; new kernel = linpack higher than nexus one by James</title>
		<link>http://www.equk.co.uk/2010/06/07/few-tweaks-new-kernel-linpack-higher-than-nexus-one/comment-page-1/#comment-1473</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jun 2010 21:11:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.equk.co.uk/?p=644#comment-1473</guid>
		<description>Helllo

I am getting ~5.100 with Linpack using your modifs (ROM: I570EXXJE4 (eclair) // kernel: LK2.06.beta4 // equk mini mod // relocate dalvik to /cache) which is good but no where close to what you are getting.

Any ideas on how to improve my score?

TIA
James</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Helllo</p>
<p>I am getting ~5.100 with Linpack using your modifs (ROM: I570EXXJE4 (eclair) // kernel: LK2.06.beta4 // equk mini mod // relocate dalvik to /cache) which is good but no where close to what you are getting.</p>
<p>Any ideas on how to improve my score?</p>
<p>TIA<br />
James</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EQUK Mini Mod v1.0 by James</title>
		<link>http://www.equk.co.uk/2010/06/15/equk-mini-mod-v1-0/comment-page-1/#comment-1472</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jun 2010 19:56:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.equk.co.uk/?p=680#comment-1472</guid>
		<description>Hello

I was driving by last night and I noticed your mini mod.
I couldn&#039;t resist installing it and after playing with it for 24 hours I am glad it did!

I am now getting ~5.100 with Linpack which is an improvement on the custom ROM I was using previously (http://forum.frandroid.com/forum/viewtopic.php?id=13642&amp;p=19).

The only minus is the loud startup.... Any tips on how to lower the startup sound track?

Regards
James</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello</p>
<p>I was driving by last night and I noticed your mini mod.<br />
I couldn&#8217;t resist installing it and after playing with it for 24 hours I am glad it did!</p>
<p>I am now getting ~5.100 with Linpack which is an improvement on the custom ROM I was using previously (<a href="http://forum.frandroid.com/forum/viewtopic.php?id=13642&amp;p=19" rel="nofollow">http://forum.frandroid.com/forum/viewtopic.php?id=13642&amp;p=19</a>).</p>
<p>The only minus is the loud startup&#8230;. Any tips on how to lower the startup sound track?</p>
<p>Regards<br />
James</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Possible New Android Project &#8211; equkmod by Paco</title>
		<link>http://www.equk.co.uk/2010/06/08/possible-new-android-project-equkmod/comment-page-1/#comment-1453</link>
		<dc:creator>Paco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 08:50:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.equk.co.uk/?p=652#comment-1453</guid>
		<description>Just found your site while searching for info on gaining more space on the i5700 (2.1, no root or other hacks). I think I will have to finally root it to be able to move things to SD. Anyhow, I find your new project very(!) interesting as it could save us (all Spica owners) lot of headaches during trying to get all of this mods one by one. So, looking forward to see the finished product!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just found your site while searching for info on gaining more space on the i5700 (2.1, no root or other hacks). I think I will have to finally root it to be able to move things to SD. Anyhow, I find your new project very(!) interesting as it could save us (all Spica owners) lot of headaches during trying to get all of this mods one by one. So, looking forward to see the finished product!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Relocate dalvik-cache &amp; free 45mb storage without losing speed by equk&#39;s place on the web &#187; Clear more space on i5700 by removing debugger dumps</title>
		<link>http://www.equk.co.uk/2010/06/05/relocate-dalvik-cache-free-45mb-storage-without-losing-speed/comment-page-1/#comment-1450</link>
		<dc:creator>equk&#39;s place on the web &#187; Clear more space on i5700 by removing debugger dumps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jun 2010 16:19:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.equk.co.uk/?p=599#comment-1450</guid>
		<description>[...] is sort of a follow on from my previous article/mod.On looking into the problem with memory usage on the samsung i5700 it seems the system is creating [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is sort of a follow on from my previous article/mod.On looking into the problem with memory usage on the samsung i5700 it seems the system is creating [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Eclair + Nexus One Launcher + Live Wallpaper + Gallery3D by pausleal</title>
		<link>http://www.equk.co.uk/2010/05/28/eclair-nexus-one-launcher-live-wallpaper-gallery3d/comment-page-1/#comment-1440</link>
		<dc:creator>pausleal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 May 2010 21:16:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.equk.co.uk/?p=551#comment-1440</guid>
		<description>This is such a great resource that you are providing and you give it away for free. I enjoy seeing websites that understand the value of providing a prime resource for free. I truly loved reading your post. Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is such a great resource that you are providing and you give it away for free. I enjoy seeing websites that understand the value of providing a prime resource for free. I truly loved reading your post. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
